95%+ Accurate Battery Capacity Estimation in Minutes
Powered by breakthrough battery diagnostics technology and the patented EVANS algorithm.
Fast, accurate, and practical battery capacity estimation for onboard and offboard applications across the automotive battery lifecycle market.

Our breakthrough is especially significant for NiMH batteries, where accurate diagnostics has long been considered impractical. Even greater potential is expected for lithium-ion batteries.
There are two techniques for diagnosing battery degradation, one using AC the other using DC.
Designed for real-world vehicle environments, our DC-based technology enables robust onboard battery capacity estimation with high noise immunity.
EIS testing method *1 |
|
|
Expected prediction accuracy |
50%〜60% (Off-board, Not applicable for On-board) |
90%(On-board diagnosis) 〜 95%+(Off-board) |
Required time |
Typically 5 to 15 min. |
3 min.(On-board) 〜 2min.(Off-board) |
Required resolution of data. |
1.00[mΩ] or less |
Depend on the vehicle sensors(On-board) 〜 12[mV]・12[mA] or less.
|
Influence of the DUT’s SOC status |
Affected by |
Not affected |
Acquired data sample. |
|
(Not disclosed) |
Calculation |
Impedance [Z] |
Capacity [Ah] |
Approach |
Steady-state Analysis |
Transient Analysis |
SMU cost and Current-type (40 modules case for Off-board) |
Approx. $360K (AC) |
Approx. $6K (DC) |
*1 There are many variations of the EIS method, the above is just one example
A typical example of the use of AC is the EIS (Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy) test method.
-
Conventional EIS methods faced a fundamental limitation: once current is applied, the battery’s internal state immediately begins to change, reducing prediction accuracy.
-
Rather than avoiding this dynamic behavior, our patented EVANS algorithm analyzes the changes themselves — enabling fast and highly accurate battery diagnostics.
In real business, prediction accuracy has the greatest impact on profitability
